Setting up a real-time data pipeline that gets data from source to destination in milliseconds is essential for many organizations that need fast insights. In this article, we’ll look at a data pipeline design using Google Cloud’s Dataflow with Apache Beam, streaming data from Kafka into Bigtable or AlloyDB, and finally into BigQuery. We’ll also explore the pros and cons of Bigtable and AlloyDB, plus alternative methods like external tables in BigQuery.
Before we dive TOO deep. I need to give credit to Preston Sharpe for leading and implementing this design pattern. I am lucky to call myself his manager.
Architecture Overview
Here’s how this setup works:
Data Source (Kafka): We start with a Kafka topic where data is continuously streamed. This could be raw data from various applications or real-time updates.
Dataflow with Apache Beam: Dataflow, Google Cloud’s managed service for stream and batch data processing, uses the Apache Beam Python SDK to pull data from Kafka. In Dataflow, the data is transformed and processed based on your needs. From here, it can go in two directions: Bigtable or AlloyDB.
Bigtable as a Staging Area for BigQuery: If you choose Bigtable, a Google Cloud BigQuery Data Stream can be configured to automatically stream data from Bigtable into BigQuery for reporting and analysis. Another option is to use an external table in BigQuery that references the data in Bigtable, allowing queries without moving data.
Alternative with AlloyDB: Instead of Bigtable, you could stream data into AlloyDB, Google’s fully managed PostgreSQL-compatible database. This provides easy querying and transactional support, but AlloyDB has some limitations around high-frequency updates, deletes, and merges, which could impact performance depending on your use case.
BigQuery as the Destination: BigQuery is the end target for analytics and reporting. With both options—whether data goes through Bigtable or AlloyDB—you end up with data available in BigQuery for near real-time insights.
Using Bigtable as a Staging Area for BigQuery
Bigtable is designed for fast, large-scale data ingestion and can serve as a high-speed staging area in this pipeline.
How It Works:
When data flows from Kafka through Dataflow and into Bigtable, it’s stored in a scalable, low-latency NoSQL database. From there, a BigQuery Data Stream can be configured to stream data from Bigtable into BigQuery automatically. This setup allows data to reach BigQuery quickly for analysis without manual intervention.
Alternatively, you can set up an external table in BigQuery that references the data in Bigtable. This way, BigQuery queries the data directly in Bigtable without moving it.
Pros of Using Bigtable:
High-Speed Writes: Bigtable handles high-throughput writes exceptionally well, making it ideal for real-time data ingestion from Kafka.
Scalability: Bigtable can scale to accommodate large datasets and high write volumes.
Seamless Integration with BigQuery: The BigQuery Data Stream integration simplifies streaming data into BigQuery with minimal latency.
Cons of Using Bigtable:
Limited Query Capabilities: You can’t perform SQL-style queries directly on Bigtable data, which is why we need to move the data to BigQuery for analysis.
Complex Schema Design: Bigtable requires careful schema planning to optimize performance, which can be challenging if you’re not familiar with NoSQL schema design.
Alternative: Using AlloyDB Instead of Bigtable
AlloyDB is Google Cloud’s fully managed, PostgreSQL-compatible database that provides better querying capabilities than Bigtable. If your use case requires frequent querying on recently ingested data, AlloyDB might be a good fit.
How It Works:
In this setup, Dataflow streams data from Kafka directly into AlloyDB. Because AlloyDB supports SQL queries out of the box, you can query data immediately without needing to move it into BigQuery. However, you can still sync AlloyDB data with BigQuery if you need BigQuery’s analytics features.
Pros of Using AlloyDB:
SQL Querying: Since AlloyDB is PostgreSQL-compatible, it’s easy to query data directly with SQL.
Transactional Support: AlloyDB supports ACID transactions, which can be valuable if you need to manage data consistency or perform complex operations.
Cons of Using AlloyDB:
Rate Limits on Update/Merge/Delete Operations: AlloyDB can handle a fair amount of inserts, but high-frequency updates, merges, or deletes might cause bottlenecks. For pipelines with high churn, this could limit performance.
Scalability for Pure Writes: Although AlloyDB scales well, it might not handle ultra-high write volumes as efficiently as Bigtable.
BigQuery as the Reporting Layer
BigQuery is the final destination for our pipeline, where data is made available for reporting and analytics. By having the data in BigQuery, you can leverage its robust analytics capabilities and use it as a source for dashboards, business intelligence tools, and real-time queries.
Bigtable-to-BigQuery Integration:
Using the BigQuery Data Stream from Bigtable allows data to be continually synced into BigQuery, making it available for analysis almost immediately after ingestion. If you only need lightweight querying and not heavy transformations, you can use an external table in BigQuery to access the data directly in Bigtable without moving it.
AlloyDB-to-BigQuery Integration:
If your data is in AlloyDB, you can set up periodic syncs to BigQuery or create custom pipelines to move transformed data into BigQuery on a schedule. This lets you take advantage of AlloyDB’s querying capabilities while also making the data available in BigQuery for advanced analytics.
Choosing the Right Architecture: That's up to you!
For Low-Latency Analytics with High Write Throughput: Use Bigtable as a staging area with Dataflow to BigQuery, or set up an external table in BigQuery.
For Real-Time Data with Frequent Queries: Stream into AlloyDB and sync with BigQuery periodically, or consider using AlloyDB directly if BigQuery isn’t required.
Comments